Using the Hodges, Preston & Hamilton article as her point of departure, Emery describes two e-book pricing models "that are beginning to emerge for libraries to explore" (p. 62).
The first model: "... content starts out Open Access and a library can opt to buy limited branded access with metadata records to load into an OPAC; upgraded purchasing options allow for perpetual access and more refined selection" (p. 62) Bloomsbury Academic is the example she describes. It is primarily for humanities and social sciences.
- Basic membership model: Provides OPAC records for content and information on usage but not perpetual access to the titles.
- Research membership model: Basic + perpetual access to 50 titles.
- Institutional sales model: Basic + option to purchase individual e-textbook titles.
- Print membership: Research or Institutional model + discount on purchase of print titles.
The second model: Evidence-Based Selection (EBS), as marketed by Elsevier. Primarily for sciences. Libraries subscribe to sets of ebooks defined by subject (chemistry, biology, etc.). Patrons get full access to the set for 12 months and then the library as the option of purchasing perpetual access to individual titles based on usage during the 12 months. This seems similar to the Cal State Fullerton model.
Emery provides the following reference to a third, patron-driven model: "To read a bit more on patron-driven models, please see Eric Hellman’s blog from 21 June 2010 <http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/2010/06/patron-driven-e-book-acquisition-crab.html>" (p. 62)
My thoughts
Interesting to see how the market is developing. Since this article was published just one year ago, it shows how dynamic the current situation is. Again, I need to talk with Follett and Mackey to see what models they are offering or considering.
No comments:
Post a Comment